Thread:Garfield1601/@comment-3581997-20140213232509

Hey I am thinking of setting up a sliding scale of heroes for some of the category pages, people are getting confused about things like Good Hearted Bastards and Pure of Heart. I mean character development or no a devil-may-care, trash talking, hedonistic, ultra violent hero who is really good deep down should never get Pure of Heart pasted across their page. I was thinking of adding to the category pages a brief qualifier to each page where one begins and another ends. But since that would be a new standard to remember heroes by I wanted to check in with you and some of the other admins first.

Here is what I was thinking in terms of the sliding scale

Paragon: Actively good heroes with no flaws and who try to do everything to help people

Pure of Heart: Heroes with no inherent flaws who are completely selfless and incorruptible, (We will exclude corruption that relies on say possession or multiple personality disorder)

Good Hearted Bastards: Heroes who have a variety of flaws and lack of principals but are good deep down

Heroic Sociopaths: Heroes with NO mortals or conscience and NO capacity for such but are heroes through a twist of circumstance, completely practical reason, not morals ones or Heroes who are heroes for their own self interests.

Protagonist Villain: Heroes that are not heroes but still the protagonist of their given work.

Those are the categories I can think of that address this sort of thing to put on the list but the main point of such a qualifier on which of those category pages would be to keep overlap to a minimum similar to our character ailment, in function. What do you think? 