Thread:Mediawatcher/@comment-4708882-20160106063355/@comment-24469175-20160416101535

Ok, there's one thing I don't understand, Kratos has a few(yet very minimal) redeeming qualities, while ares had none, if that's the case, how is Kratos more vile?

I mean this is how I feel about teppei hojo compared to miyo takano and shion sonozaki, how I feel about shou tucker and envy, and how I feel about Bradley and Lelouch as well as many other villains, I get that it's a resource thing, but still. Same thing about shou tucker and many villains from his series.

Kratos has some redeeming value, while ares had none, yet somehow Kratos is still more vile.

Hell my character Michael has some good values, but has very low resources, while Lloyd and Paul Trevors had more resources and did less. And somehow they are still monsters, I mean I want them to be monsters, but still Michael still doing far worse, does that disqualify them or what?

And then there's bill cipher and Preston northwest and I'm talking about before WierdMageddon premiered, and Preston was disqualified because bill cipher was doing worse, even though he had a lot more resources.