Thread:Mediawatcher/@comment-3581997-20150104141725/@comment-3581997-20150105055124

Since Pure of heart and Complete Monster are 100% alignment one way or another the same standard that applies to one can apply to the other. To that effect you are right to be picky about what applies. Now character evolution happens Good Hearted Bastards or Outright Heroes can become Pure of heart through proper characterization and the same applies to the inverse for Complete Monster, the rule of thumb I use is if some one is willing to site an example, ANY example where the subject was anything other than 100% evil or 100% good all others need to accept that the category can not apply to them. To wit- I believe that Dr. Hojo from Final Fantasy VII on Villains wiki is completely 110%, capital E Evil, he has no redeeming qualities and ruins people's lives pretty much for no reason, yet Complete Monster was removed from him, I did not re-add it or take issue with it because if someone felt there was even a small issue with that it should not apply, that is the thing about absolutes, if some one legitimately disagrees with the assignment you need to make the conservative play to maintain the high standard of the category.

I don't know about Spongebob since I am not an avid fan but I know that Sonic has multiple incarnations and some may apply, so it depends if the page has a Status dependent on version category as well. Unfortunately that applies to certain cartoon character who have no specific continuity to work off of.

So to sum up: If you feel a page does not apply to Pure of heart remove it, please replace it with either Outright Heroes or Good Hearted Bastards but since the category should have high standards you are well within your rights to be critical.