Thread:Hornetzilla78/@comment-1084762-20160923130735

I find it funny that you have a plagiarism rule and, yet, when someone removes content on the basis of that very rule, you ban them.

if you'd like to deal with Wikia directly and have the content forcefully removed, we can go that way. or, y'know, you can be reasonable and actually follow the rule you've enforced on this wiki before.

but you know what the REALLY funny part is, though? "--articles that are obviously taken from other wikis will be deleted as a matter of principle." mmm. matter of principle? I wasn't aware banning anyone who went by that exact principle was also common. seems like a pretty whacky rule!

if you had actually taken a look, Riley more than explained what was up with the content on this wiki and why he was prepping for removal. it's kinda hilarious that you just assume he's vandalizing without any other further investigating, especially considering this is the kind of thing that can get the wiki in trouble.

and since you're so dead-set on trying to accuse Riley of "vandalism" even though the plagiarism is clear, take a look at the MK Wiki and look at literally any page that we share. copied.

now, that said, you can either re-remove the copied content (deletion isn't necessary but it's IN your rule, so..) or Wikia can get involved. and y'know considering just how many other pages i've seen with plagiarized content at a first glance, just from a few minutes, they won't be particularly happy with the operation going on here. 