User blog comment:KGBSpetsnaz/Pure Good Removal Proposal: Santa Claus/@comment-26083398-20190913000237

Queen Misery and NerdWithAKeyboard bring up good points, simply giving naughty children is not a disqualifying trait, as the action is disclinary and in fact justfied:  Santa does it to discourage bad behavior and encourage good behavior, and those isn't technically overly harsh.

Honestly, I feel the so-called commercial exploitation is exaggerated as-well, as technically Santa Claus has his roots in both folklore in addition to pop culture. In virtually all of his incarnations, he is also not arrogant, as he is rather modest.

I think the type dependent on version is abit more justified for removal, but this in turn is also debatable to an extant as well. Only some European incarntations of Santa have Krampus present, but even then, his true motives to naughty children are not fully understood as well. He could possibly be taking the naughty children to Santa's workshop simply because Santa wants to teach them why being naughty is wrong. The horror film of the same name is also very exaggerated as well.

It's a keeper in my opinion.