Thread:Mediawatcher/@comment-4708882-20160426013645/@comment-24469175-20170114104949

Here's how I see the crystal gems and diamond dilemma, it's not completely black and white, but the diamonds are far more in the black than the crystal gems, no matter how you look at it. Saying the crystal gems and rose are worse is clearly just someone being blind.

It's like if I killed Hitler's mother and father and then he went on to do what he did, sure it makes him somewhat sympathetic, but does that really put me more in the wrong than him.

Lord shen's parents sent him away because he tried to kill all the pandas in existence and he went into massive grief over it, does that put his parents more in the wrong than him?

Kickass killed Chris d amicos dad and he killed hundreds of people and killed kickass's dad as well, does that really make him better than kickass.

Take note all of these were done for justifiable reasons, not just because of malicion, even if it was malicion, doesn't automatically make the victim a better person than the killer.

Rose killing pink diamond was to save the earth, the diamonds even before the act was committed were killing millions maybe even billions of people in the past, just because rose killed pink diamond doesn't automatically make her worst than them. The diamonds are still awful, sympathetic but still awful.