Thread:Overseer80/@comment-3581997-20140204062851/@comment-15895329-20140204201343

The problem with the last bit is that that is solely a matter of opinion. Some people do believe that if you go through enough Character Development you can become Pure of heart and in fact it says on the very page that redeemed villains can potentially qualify. Wolverine and Vegeta are poor examples to back up your more cynical view because even as heroes they still have MANY morally ambiguous qualities. But someone who starts as that but becomes something else can become Pure of heart later on. At least that's how I see it. Starting as a flawed person should not be able to keep you from becoming PoH later on if you really do become a totally differerent person, especially since taking your stance to it's logical conclusion redemption in general would never be possible. But that's not how I see it.

And you tremendously exaggerate Mordin's flaws. Mordin is not as heedless to life as you make him out to be, he simply has no qualms with killing the bad guys. But that's in ME 2. In ME 3 he's changed and no longer acts quite the same way he used to. This is my point.

And I do not believe that PoH have to be totally immune to anger or corruption. A PoH character can face temptation but if they never succumb they're still PoH. But they can be tempted. As for anger come on. Everyone gets angry. Captain America has gotten angry, Superman has gotten angry, Aang has gotten angry. That's a terrible reason to keep a character from being Pure of heart.

I'm afraid I still don't agree. Your standards are stricter than mine and those of the page as it currently reads and frankly I prefer the latter. Regardless the Mordin Solus one seems to have been pretty much settled, since I removed the MA category myself.