Thread:Emeraldblade95/@comment-2059440-20191005025703/@comment-26083398-20191005031713

I've been seeing a surge of that as well lately, mainly from Kronika X Cetrion (not that I'm trying to pin the blame on anyone intentionally), but also from others as well. If you take a look at several of the more recent ones, namely Fox McCloud and Fievel Mousekewitz, you can see a number of users only put yes votes with the simple descriptions as:

"Yes, because he is kind, loyal, selfless, and honest."

"Yes. He cares about his friends and family."

"Yes, because he's good and kind hearted"

"keep, he is perfect candidate"

This is just to name a few, their are more on these blogs, plus many others as well.

While some of us take our time to write critques (whether long or short), other don't seem to be taking this system very seiously, and just write a quick vote, almost as though they jump to instant conclusions about the charcters like "Oh they have this qualifying trait, they should automatically be included to the category.  I can understand writing a short review about your vote, such as going into detail on why you think they should qualify or not, but this is not the case for these users.

Lastly, I've noticed several of the users coting have only created accounts to vote on this proposals and not to edit actual pages like what the wikis are meant to be for.

I think its time a new set of rules should be set for PG Proposals and what kind of reasons are legitimate and which ones are not.