Thread:Queen Misery/@comment-3581997-20180303183913/@comment-2059440-20180304123601

I believe that anyone who is doing anything worthwhile has enemies as well as allies, in fact the more opposition one faces often the more one should continue as there's no figure in history who has achieved anything without having many people trying to break them down or generally being antagonistic.

sometimes it is simply opposing views, other times (especially on internet) it is regression to caveman days and feuds - the primal desire to always be "right".. I believe I already shared the "Annoying Peasant" scene with you from Monty Python, that is basically how arguments on internet tend to go.. no one can win because it is a fallacy to begin with.

Villains adminship, for a while, descended into both the "Annoying Peasant" scenario and then the caveman feuding - all over stupid things.. some parts of it still are and I'll leave them to it.. the important thing is the petty "Game of Thrones"-esque battling of admins is much less open than it was before and it isn't destabilizing the wiki as a whole as it did prior.

the Austin/Pendragon feud will likely never end but the two have at least learned to back down a bit, as long as it stays between them and doesn't return to a wiki-wide event I'm leaving them to it and getting back to my work.

oh yes, I named names - because everyone knows what is happening it's just most people on the wiki are smart enough to ignore it now.. which is why I returned : as a whole the wiki is good, no point leaving over the "underbelly" as it were (every wiki, community etc has an "underbelly" of unpleasant things.. as long as it stays under and not public, so be it).