Thread:BeholderofStuff/@comment-27022982-20180816202344

Hi, BeholderofStuff. I was just wondering: can you please add Pure Good Discussions to the Discussions list in this wiki? The Pure Evil Discussions was added to the Discussions list in the Heroes Wiki. And seeing that Pure Good heroes are the complete opposite of Pure Evil villains, can you please add what's  down below into the Rules in the Categories section? Thanks and have a great day. Anyways, this is what I hope will be added to the Rules in the Categories section:

(Does the character have a define personality? Or is it a one-dimensional character such as a mindless protecting creature?) (Does the character commit acts that are extremely admirable and can be forgivable? Does the character stand out from the rest of the heroes featured in the story they are part of?) (Has the hero crossed the Goodness Zone?) (Does the hero use every resource they have at their disposal to cause a maximum of good?) (Does the hero have an agency over their actions, and can distinguish right from wrong?) (Is the hero completely devoid of any uncharitable quality?) (Can the hero be sympathetic and forgivable with a Freudian excuse?) (Are the heroes' best acts on-screen?) (Is the hero the best, or at least one of the best characters in the story?) (Is the story "normal", or purposefully over-the-top appalling? In which case, the Admirable Standards would be so high that it would be almost impossible to have a Purely Good hero in the story.) 
 * 1) Do not add/remove the Pure Good category without going to the Discussion first : As the Pure Good category is our most popular category, it is also our most abused-so propose the villain FIRST in the Discussion under "Pure Good Discussion" to see what the majority thinks before adding them. Refer to this page to gain some experience in the field before proposing the character if you have none. If you add a hero to Pure Good without proposing them in the Discussion first, the category will be removed. If by any chance you have a hero from your original work (that does not fall under fan fiction) and you want to propose the hero, have another user go over your work and propose said hero for you to avoid bias-if you vote for your own hero the vote will NOT count. The deadline for votes on whether or not the hero counts is one week. If the effortpost has a downvote, it has to have six more upvotes to qualify, but if it has no downvotes and only upvotes, but doesn't have six upvotes by the time of the deadline, it will still qualify. By then the discussion post will be locked and the official decision will be made. In the case of a tie, there will be a 1 week extension to accept NEW VOTES from different users. Should a tie persist, then after a review of the status of users who already cast votes (if currently blocked, their vote is voided), then THE LAST VALID VOTE CAST at time of deadline can be counted twice (tie breaker). Any votes from a sockpuppet account will NOT be counted. If all votes are Undecided, the votes will not count. This same strategy applies if you wish to remove a hero whose been accepted by the majority of wiki members as PG from the category. If you remove the category without going to the Discussion first we will add it back in. You will judge the hero by this criteria:
 * 2) *CHARACTERS' TRAITS
 * 1) *ADMIRABLE STANDARDS
 * 1) *GOODNESS ZONE
 * 1) *INDIVIDUAL CAPABILITY
 * 1) *MORAL AGENCY
 * 1) *ONLY INDIVIDUALS
 * 2) *NO CORRUPTING QUALITIES
 * 1) *NO UNFEELING
 * 1) *SCREEN TIME
 * 1) *BEST
 * 1) *STORY TYPE