Thread:Red Chevalier/@comment-36740624-20190406155938/@comment-34055410-20190406224714

Okay, both of you seem to be misunderstanding why I re-closed the thread. Here’s why: in the end, I was too tired to continue debating, so I felt like continuing the debate at a better time. However, since I had a feeling Red will remove the categories again (he might think the debate is over when it isn’t; I was just taking a break), I decided to give a temporary reason on why the categories should stay for now: even if my reasons on why the Doctor counts as The Messiah, Elderly, etc. are wrong, it’s still possible that he counts as these in another continuity. So no, that doesn’t equate to me running out of proof. I was just finding a reason to put the debate aside at the moment before the flames start. However, Red even had to debate against that with the whole “burden of proof” argument, even though my whole point of leaving that “we have no proof that he doesn’t qualify” reply is to temporarily stop the debate (no, in case you’re wondering, I’m not pointing fingers or blaming anyone; I’m just explaining as honestly as I can on why I re-closed the thread. I’ll even admit that my attitude wasn’t very bright). So, I got frustrated and re-closed the thread.