Thread:Mesektet/@comment-31739156-20160428190256/@comment-3581997-20160428191607

Personally no. But this is Heroes Wiki, Use:Joyce Kinney in particular has been putting up background characters for a while and no heroic deeds for them. I was willing to tolerate it for a while but she keeps doing it and it is setting bad example. Heroes need to preform heroic tasks. Ms Hover's page for example just drones on about appearance and how she is really kind beneath her arrogant demeanor, and the only example given to that effect is she once told Lisa she could get a drink of water before a stressful test. And by the way, I recall that episode, she then sternly tells her to come back and take the test. A pet the dog moment ultimately subverted is not a heroic epic to base a character around. Even Edna Krabbaple has more accomplishments to her character than hover. We are not fan base wiki, we are Heroes Wiki, we can't keep allowing articles to be little more than fan pages. Deeds, personality and goals are what a good article will have in addition to all the window dressing like trivia, a photo and maybe a few images scattered through-out. But the 2000 some odd background characters in Family Guy, The folks from Simpson who are Heroes by default because they happen to live in Springfield and no other reason given, no. The willingness to let certain contributors indulge their creativity is being abused when all background characters are added because they exist on the show. Mr. Burns is a villain, his "Heroic Deeds" were all pet the dog moments, Mrs. Skinner is mainly an antagonist, no deeds were even bothered to be listed. Helen Lovejoy became the Meme for busybody moral guardians for crying out loud and the article doesn't even try to make her anything else. Joyce Kenny only ever acts as an antagonist on the one episode she is anything but a background news reporter. This sort of thing needs to stop.