Thread:Mediawatcher/@comment-3581997-20140707045155/@comment-3581997-20140707221646

I understand your concern. These are the sorts of standards that can blur the lines. Whatever the admins decide will stand but I have two pieces of advice for you-

1. Try talking to AlexHoskins, he was the contributor pulling for letting such an example stay, he also is an active member who tries to prevent abuse of articles if you want to prevent future examples from skirting by he is a good one to talk to with your concerns and since he is not an admin you can challenge him (be respectful though if you do).

2. If the final verdict allows the article, go to the talk page of the article and voice your conerns. Doing so on a talk page instead of the main article will allow you to list your objections in great detail for admins and future contributors without affecting the main article and so it is not considered any form of abuse (as long as you don't curse out any users or anything like that of course.)

I will update you as soon all the votes are in and delete the page immediately after that if the nays have it.