Thread:Mesektet/@comment-27729149-20151002041329/@comment-3581997-20151007090811

Ah I see where the miscommunication is coming from, "possible" is not the same as "likely". It's possible Jesus, Alice Elliot and Aslan could/could-have build/built up enough malice to destroy their sense of morality, because one's morals can always decent, none too likely but they could all have gone down that path. It shows that anyone can get to the point of Complete Monster, is a state where one just stops caring about even the base outline of morals and standards. Pure of heart though is a state where one is incorruptible, an idolized state, as such their morals, once fully formed, demonstrate time and time again that they can not be swayed. Observing one who is Pure of heart is often a case of seeing if they are incorruptible or they eventually falter, if they do it doesn't instantly make them Complete Monsters but is shows that they can get there and as such they weren't Pure of heart.

It's like that video I showed you with Shinobu Sensui, he was at first a seen as a virtuous and true incorruptible soul, but as it turned out he had a breaking point, a very understandable one but fact is he did break and Pure of hearts don't break- thus he did not so much stop being Pure of heart as it turned out he was just never fully tested, and he did descend very close to the Complete Monster station after his decent because he fell so hard. Many can be seen as Pure of heart but if they cease those behaviors it doesn't mean so much they stop being Pure of heart as much as it was a misapplied view of them in the first place. Is that clearer?