Thread:ThatScrewyDuck/@comment-40081978-20190921195646/@comment-39032584-20190921205252

Since this is on my message wall,  I think it's safe to assume you directed this question at me, so even though Emeraldblade95 already gave you a good answer, I'll respond too. To put your mind at ease, no, I didn't complain to him about the quality of the proposals based on yours. I was primarily basing it on a couple of the users not only putting out an excessive amount of them, but most of all, because their so--called "proposals" consist almost solely of information that's clearly been copied and pasted from the already-existing pages of the characters the proposals are for, and even though I'm not an administrator, I find that outright insulting. It's like they think all they need to do to make a proposal is, for example, copy the info from the character's personality section, and boom, they have their arguments for the character's lack of corrupting factors and how far they are into the "goodness zone". That's just not right; do they think that everybody who reads their proposals are so dumb and oblivious that they won't notice that their arguments are word-for-word the same as what's already written on the character's page? It's so obvious it's not even funny, and to me, it demonstates a complete disregard for the instructions outlined in the tutorials.

Anyway, sorry to rant. In short, no, I wasn't thinking of you or your proposals when I went to the administrators to bring this issue to their attention.