Thread:Garfield1601/@comment-15895329-20131231192124

I figured this was something worth noting.

Why have the True Neutral category? This is twice now you've refused to accept it's pertaining to characters who are of that alignment. If every character who does good, even when it is inconsistent, is good in your eyes, why have the neutral categories? Why not just have the Good categories and be done with it? Because Elsa is True Neutral.

She does not set out to be good or evil

She wants to be left alone

She does not like to get invovled in other people's problems

These things make her NEUTRAL. I suppose you could argue that she becomes Good by the end of the movie, which is fair, but I feel we should list her as the alignment she is for most of the film, which is True Neutral. And if you're going to insist that she's not I would like to know what would constitute a true neutral hero in your mind. Otherwise we should just straight up get rid of the category if no one fits it.

Spongebob is also sometimes True Neutral because there are many occasions where he is not particularly helpful and in fact is sometimes (albeit unintentionally) harmful. Given that I would say he is sometimes Neutral Good, sometimes True Neutral. His alignment depends on the episode. So he should be listed as both. 