Thread:Mediawatcher/@comment-3581997-20150104141725/@comment-27729149-20150105021518

What apples for pure of heart, because some heroes don't have any villainous qualities and yet they don't apply so what is needed in order for them to count. Some of them are pacifists and want nothing more than help out other people. Me personally I don't think characters like spongebob and sonic should really count, they're have been multiple occasions where they tend to lose their heroic standards and tend to do things that are just harsh especially for them, not evil but they are incredibly flawed. The same goes for heroes like rainbow dash and rarity they have shown signs of selfishness and sometimes even doing the wrong thing on purpose, like before they're not villains, but they have shown to be able to be corrupt. So what does it take for a hero to be pure of heart. Another thing I thought was odd was Optimus, mainly because in number 4 he was acting homicidal and even saying that he'll kill humans if they get in his way and yet he's considered a pure of heart. So me personally think that the pure of heart category needs to be established a little better. I'm also curious about complete monster, some villains have no redeeming qualities, Trevor Phillips is an example, and yet they're not considered complete monsters. So what does it take for a villain to be a complete monster and a hero to be pure of heart.