Thread:B1bl1kal/@comment-25039880-20160901163934/@comment-25039880-20160901180305

Actually no, I wasn't luring Jester of Chaos on my side. I only questioned him since I personally view him in a higher position of Villains Wiki than you are (no offense, nor do I believe it, It's just something I assume since he primarily interacts with myself).

Also, about the Infoboxs, I only put down what I believed was specifically knowledge about the villains whom I believed need to be "properly corrected" since they weren't "specifically described enough".

Plus, I for one believe that some users have rights to create a subsidiary account to give their own primary accounts a break for a while. But on this occasion, it hasn't been working out ever since that circumstance I monthly had occurred.

All there's left about this discussion is why you predict that every thing I argue about is completely false. I'm not saying that it's not entirely true nor it isn't fair in anyway, surely you have to agree with a least something that I say is understanding.

Thoughts?