Thread:Red Chevalier/@comment-36740624-20190406155938/@comment-24439896-20190406204147

Rogues - Saitama is a loner yes, no question about it, but he has worked with others and that's enough to negate this category. We already have a category for Loner Heroes, it's called "Loner Heroes"

Unwanted - I'll admit this had more to do with my misinterpretation of what the category was. "Unwanted" makes it sound like he wasn't wanted by anyone but what you described fits the category description. Perhaps "outcasts" would be a better name.

Omnipotents - Saitama has a few other powers besides his physical ones yes, but that doesn't mean he's omnipotent. His power just hasn't been quantified. He could very well be omnipotent but we don't know his full power yet.

Heroic Disciplinarian: Saitama teaches Genos yes, but he's a teacher, not a strict punisher.

Inept: I guess so. I'll concede I was too hasty to remove that category.

Anti-Hero: Flawed hero is not Anti-hero. Saitama is a hero for fun, yes, and does lose his temper at certain points, but he doesn't have a villainous bent to him. At most you could say he's a neutral force since he's mainly in it for his own reason.

Goal Heroes: Saitama's goal isn't that hard for him though. Honestly I think this category is dumb since every hero has a goal, that's why there's a "goal" section on the infobox.

Byronic: Flawed hero is not Byronic Hero. Byronic hero is a specific archetype.

The Icon: That's not the Icon though, that's Saitama being Inspiring. This wiki has a lot of redundant categories though so I could be getting them mixed up.

Rivals: If that's how the wiki defines it then that's different than how I've seen it defined elsewhere. Also, isn't that already covered under "arch-enemy"?

Special Agent: Yes, but the Hero Association isn't an agency like the FBI. It's mostly just there as a registration service for heroes and to make sure heroes aren't placed against foes that are out of their league.

Evil exterminators: Saitama is kind of single-minded in his approach it, but he lacks the obsessiveness required by the category.