What?
I'm sorry guys, but what I am saying is the truth.
The Mercenaries: Unfortunately, the mercenaries, depending on their personality/goals/actions, they range from being malignant, to even benign, but mainly as anti-heroes to anti-villains, and the same applies with the Team Fortress 2 mercs.
Jabba the Hutt and Boba Fett: Jabba may not be taking part in the conflict, but his actions make it clear that he is malevolent, in addition to being independent. Boba Fett is more of an anti-villain turned anti-hero, and he is pretty much formerly evil, and stepped over to being good.
I mean, to be more clear and fair, I will concede that neutrality exists in the sense of not partaking in conflicts/conundrums, as well as during good vs. evil conflicts, that goes without saying. But it is vitally important to note, that I am only calling it nonexistent, in the sense that its in association with morality. In real life, judges may be neutral in the sense that they are not taking sides in a conflict or anything, but morality wise, their morality is either evil for the corrupt ones, while the more reasonable ones are good.
Twilight Sparkle during the Hoofield conflict, had not taken sides, but she is Lawful Good.
As for the characters/real-life people taking sides, whether its good or evil, is contradictory against neutrality as a meaning, and plus, betrayal is an evil action.
That being said, neutrality exists, but not in the field of morality.
To be honest, you didn't respond my latest reply to you directly,
@Emeraldblade95 Sorry, but if they aren't good to begin with, then what's the point of having them on the wiki to begin with? Bad (evil people) apples in a benign faction is possible, and once the heroes realize what sort of people they are, they will be kicked out and facing justice/karma.
If I were in the D&D creator's shoes, I would rather there would be just both good and evil axes.
Lawful Good = Order & Justice
Lawful Evil = Order & Control
Chaotic Good = Freedom Seeker for oneself and/or others.
Chaotic Evil = Selfish Freedom & Mayhem
Neutral Good = Freedom & Order Balancer/Complies with rules and laws, but breaks/bends them if they get in the way of doing good.
Neutral Evil = Freedom & Order Balancer for selfish gain./Complies with rules and laws, but breaks/bends them if they get in the way of doing evil.
Also, if a character has more often than not committed some evil actions, have malignant actions outweighing the good ones, or even the severity of the evil acts, they are of the evil alignments. But if a specific character has more often than not committed good deeds, have malignant actions outweighing the evil ones, or even the severity of the benign deeds, they are of the good alignments.
In the cases of being just a basic character, like I said before, their actions and goals dictate their morality for us. In the Hazardous Environment Combat Unit's case, there are soldiers who are definitely of the Lawful Evil alignment as they have no problem with killing scientists, BUT, and this is a big but, the ones who are just following orders and/or have a conscience, veer to Lawful Good.
As for Rorschach, he is a Lawful Good, anti-hero vigilante of order and justice, and he has a heroic duty to oppose various criminals.
Conan the Barbarian, is another anti-hero, but he is indeed Chaotic Good given his overall actions in the end.
With that said, the Lawful, True, to Chaotic Neutral categories have to go.
Neutrality in terms of morality, in truth, is a actually a myth, specifically Lawful Neutral right up to Chaotic Neutral. A character's actions pretty much dictate what their morality is for them, and same applies in real life. Only both evil and good exist.
https://www.str.org/w/the-myth-of-moral-neutrality
So, what I propose, is for Lawful, Neutral, to Chaotic Neutral to be erased altogether.
Neutrality in terms of morality, in truth, is a actually a myth, specifically Lawful Neutral right up to Chaotic Neutral. A character's actions pretty much dictate what their morality is for them, and same applies in real life.
https://www.str.org/w/the-myth-of-moral-neutrality
Since there is now the villains and heroes wiki, Will there ever be a neutrality and gray zone wiki anytime in the far future for neutral characters like Beerus, Grand Zeno, Squidward Tentacles, etc? Because to be honest though, characters of the grey zone wouldn't truly fit the heroes nor the villains wikis, nor even the categories related to neutrality. At least for the sake of categorization purposes.
BTW, you people are also free to give this some upvotes if you want to make these two wikis possible.
