Instead of raging at me, you should contemplate over your own misconducts. If I remember correctly, you already has 5 blocks under your record. 4 of them 2 separate accounts of repeated offenses. Thitd repetition would be a charm...
Atidanx215079 wrote: Instead of raging at me, you should contemplate over your own misconducts. If I remember correctly, you already has 5 blocks under your record. 4 of them 2 separate accounts of repeated offenses. Thitd repetition would be a charm...
Don't start with me I already have dude. I won't get my acount deleted dude. Yet I am never blocked on this wiki
I wasn't making any demands. I was merely reporting, with the decision of what to do with you resting solely upon the admin I submitted my report of you to decide your fate, and the admin I reported you passed his judgment.
you don't want to be reported? Abide by fandoms' rules and don't violate them. End of argument.
Atidanx215079 wrote: I wasn't making any demands. I was merely reporting, with the decision of what to do with you resting solely upon the admin I submitted my report of you to decide your fate, and the admin I reported you passed his judgment.
once again, you don't want to be deleted? Abide by fandoms' rules and don't violate them. End of argument.
Due my account can't be delete unless it's a perment ban and you were warned not to make that request before a block.
do not confuse demand with a simple report. Report is all I did and it is all I can do. If you keep doing what you are doing even after your block gets lifted, I will then once again report you to admin. Admin then can decide your fate.
I will take them as honest mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes. Now that you know, don't do it again.
here are my recommendations:
1. I recommend you to write more than just five sentences on pages you create to be on a safe side, as sometimes things are not always clear-cut.
2. Trivias and quotes are not counted as legitimate required minimum sentences.
3. all additional templates such as Reconstruction, Stubs etc. are applicable only after you fulfill minimum requirement by writing at least 5 sentences. Everything begins with 5 sentences fulfillment.
4. all admins are different: some admins do not really mind, while others are very adamant about rules. It is up to you to discover admins' personalities.
5. Be sure to write heroes' heroisms. Being simply protagonist/victim/recurrence does not grant character automatic hero status.
him? Annoyed? I am just as much annoyed by him constantly bringing those deleted articles in a haphazard manner, without asking others for rewriting just because he is an admin. He didn't give them a flying ^&*( before and those were left for god knows how long. And all of sudden he does give a d--- about them? He should have rewrote them before they were found and deleted. He had more than ample time to rewrite them.
I lost count of how many of these 'revived' articles by AlexHoskins contained considerable amount of plagiarized materials. Btw, those one-liner he says, are mislabeled disguised as Stubs and had been left neglected and untouched for no-one-knows how long. I saw them and believer of rules are made to be enforced, I merely followed what the rules of the fandom says, and I am the one with problems?
Emeraldblade95 wrote: Many of the articles are/were obscure, and many of us (myself included) didn't know about their existence or pay attention to them until just now.
can't be an excuse. We all have access to categories requiring urgent attention such as
candidate for deletion
to check on what articles need upgrading or expansion before the allotted time is passed for deletion. I did that and am doing that as we talk. Many of you people did not. So those obscure pages getting deleted could have been avoided if many of users and admins checked these attention-requiring categories more diligently before they are found with states as they are. The blame lies on those who failed to check them more often. The rules regarding obscure pages being left far too long or the allotted time are as clear as daylight.
and if people put mislabel templates due to their lack of knowledge, the fault is once again on htem, because they are the ones who should read rules thoroughly before joining the fandom.
I apologize if I sound rude, but I feel as if I am being labeled a bad guy here for diligently following what rules of fandom says.
AlexHoskins wrote: Quite an accurate analysis there, Atidanx215079. Again, sorry for the conflict. (Sigh) wish people would put more effort on their pages.
sir. I know this might not be my place to say it, but I feel I must. You might, at some point, want to tell others who keep demanding you to revive deleted pages that they must recreate those articles with their own hands, from the scratch. When I cruised through one such message board, I got the feeling that you granted them favors one too many times and they seem to think it is their inalienable right that you revive deleted pages for them and seems to have forgotten their places as users.
Just wanted you to know. Some wikis burrowed some information from other wikis to expand their article while giving credit. Take Zora Lancaster in the Disney Wiki for example. Disney burrowed that information from the Sonny with a Chance Wiki, while giving credit. I wonder that if we’d do the same, but with different sentence and words. The people here are not putting any effort making their sentences though.
like you said, the problem is with the people, who are simply too lazy to put some effort on their part: just an hour or two out of their 24 hour day. If they can't even afford to spare that much time they should not create pages.
it's their fault for not spending time with rules of the fandom. In our society we still get repercussion for being ignorant and lack of awareness, And they should be no exception and should face repercussion.
As for one-liners and deletion candidates, there are/have been rules written in the fandom regarding them. But it is rarely ever enforced, if at all and left neglected for god knows how long - until I came along. With the deletion report I do and have them deleted - meaning I do actually believe in enforcing the rule looks like I managed to bring some people's attention.
It is a user who has the status in chat to moderate a community's chat room. They can ban users from chat, which will kick a user out of the chat and prevent them from returning until a chat moderator, discussion moderator, or admin unbans them from the user's contributions page or until the ban expires.
I am not sure I am up to it. It is less than a month since I joined this fandom. I am still exploring the fandom, there are still many things I do not understand, and I am not that well-versed with net chats and net community activities.
well sir, I was told that once the P template is put in place, we have between 2 weeks and a month at maximum to rectify the pages. I suppose you have a month to rewrite them. Still, as an admin you should know better.
just don't do it again next time.