May I have permission to make a page for Captain Caveman from the new Scooby Doo movie on villains wiki? Because the guy was not only an antagonist in the movie but he also did commit a few crimes: assault (as he did attack Blue Falcon and Scooby-Doo), animal abuse (by attacking Scooby-Doo since he was an animal), and a few more. Also can you remove him from the honorable category on heroes wiki because the guy isn’t quite the opposite of a cheater as he did kinda cheat in his battle with Blue Falcon and Scooby-Doo.
There is a huge debate going on my message wall about Dr. Facilier being Pure Evil. Since you know about The Princess and the Frog better than I do, I'm going to let you end this discussion because Romeo and Robot is still keeping up this pointless argument after I've already explained to him why I believe that Facilier is PE.
We must help the sister wiki, Heroes wiki, for it looks inferior compared to Villains wiki. After all there must be balance in between. Me and B1bl1kal are asking people around if there are users who want to contribute their time into making Heroes wiki as good as villains wiki. What do you think of this idea? If you want to join, answer us in this link. https://hero.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Legoreader12345hello
Not talking about this recent incident specifically, but Dark, in general, you have a history of constantly inciting edit wars, even in the face of other users giving you sound reasoning and throughout this whole month, there has barely been an entire day where you haven't bickered over something (including far-fetched theories, infobox images, formatting among other things). With this Hypno incident, I at least knew when to stop and moved on. But then there are moments from you which have been like this:
My reasonings were pretty clear here, and yet you say "Fine" while spitefully reverting my edit again without making any counter argument after the fact, which comes off as pretty childish to be completely frank. Granted, these might not be the precise reasons why Austin blocked you for all I know, but a lot of these incidents are extremely tiring to deal with on an almost-daily basis.
I didn't get in edit wars with anyone except you. Second the actors panel should of been added since it's three actors and when it's just one video it should be ==Video== not ==Gallery== because there isn't photos. Austin blocked me for saying the term What are you on about it's obvious.
And i said Fine because i dont have the energy to fight with you since you won't listen and keep pushing your view. And i did NOT make any Intimidating behaviour/harassment to any user to that's a false ban.
A long list of actors is what should warrant a portrayal section rather than just three (again, refer to the Joker or even Darth Vader for examples). As for galleries, we don't need to include an "Images" section in a gallery if there are only just images in it, so the same should apply if there are only videos in a gallery.
As for "intimidating/behavior harassment", I'm not too sure why that's part of the ban reasoning either since you didn't say anything bad.
Alright that isn't really a problem about the gallery and the portrayal section it's just a way of view of editing. There should be in my opinon a list how many actors are needed to have the list like maybe 4 would be enough?
And i think this was a mistake personally. Because i didn't say anything rude to you. As i said multiple times in the past i have nothing against you, just we have sometimes different view points on editing.