FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • In case you miss this on the blog post I wanted to ask what rule are you talking about that isn't on the Villains Wiki? because we have rules against antagonist fussing and there are minimum standards for Pure Evil proposal, I am just a bit confused about what you mean.

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • I agree with the rule, and as far as I know, this isn't restricted to characters with tons of fussing. It happened with Queen Elsa's article, and I think that was justifiable considering it can happen with any article in this wiki. After I do get permission from a Villains Wiki admin, I'll be proposing it there.

        Loading editor
    • Is still really hate this rule I don't think it's fair to get rid of the antagonist label completely just because a few articles have issues with it. It still servers a very important role and the words a character appeared in X doesn't tell us how important the role of the character is as it can mean anything from appeared for 40 minutes and is the biggest focus to only appeared for 5 seconds in a cameo with no lines.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I made a removal proposal for Vic Hoskins on the Great Villains Wiki. I noticed you have contributed there on a few occasions. If you don’t want of other editors that is perfectly okay but if it isn’t okay with you could you vote to remove him please? If not that is fine and you can enjoy the rest of your day.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • The infobox proposal is now set. It's time to spread the word. Pass it on.

    Godspeed. :-)

      Loading editor
  • Pure good characters can only attack people if they are attacked first. But when Ray sees Naveen talking to Evangeline he proceeds to attack Naveen and start pucnhing him. Doesn't that disqualify him.

      Loading editor
    • I guess it would, but I've never seen the full The Princess and the Frog movie for myself, so I can't really say.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I wanted to ask you a friendyl question. What is your thought on Dr. Facilier being pure evil? I loved your removal proposal for King Runeard. What's your thoughts on Facilier? If you ask me he doesn't count because he respected Tiana for dreaming big and offered her the resturant she wanted, he was not going to betray Lawrence and didn't force him into villainy and only offered the "wayward" souls of New Orleans and he only did so to survive. He also is tragic and a scapegoat he spent years of his life as a poor person and is death seemed to be sympathiec as even Tiana felt sorry for him and he suffered far worse than anyone else as he never killed anyone. Even with Ray he united him with Evangeline.

      Loading editor
    • View all 8 replies
    • Okay. I'm tired of endlessly debating on this, so I'm going to bring this up to an admin so he can end this case.

        Loading editor
    • Sorry. Thanks for your opnion anyway.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • DO you think the Indominus-rex is pure evil? I do as she was killing for sport and had a sibling but she ate it so she isn't tragic or amoral. She has the highest body count of any villain in the franchise and is worse than the Indoraptor.

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • Yes; the Indoraptor can be sympathied with because he truly was a tragic figure, being tortured and abused by Eli Mills and his goons just so he could be auctioned and Mills would get rich out of it. Also, the Indoraptor didn't deserve the gruesome death he got, as Blue could've at least showed him what he was doing was wrong via raptor communications and lived a happy life with him together instead of being alone.

        Loading editor
    • Thank you! Indoraptor had it FAR worse, killed much less people and killed for food. Also they were deleted scene and concept art potraying the Indoraptor being abused.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Can you please remove deletion-candidate for w:c:villains:The Dogcatcher (Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure)? The page says that he's clearly a villain.

      Loading editor
    Misry6
    Misry6 closed this thread because:
    User was blocked permanently in the Villains Wiki for justifiable reasons.
    19:24, April 27, 2020
  • I understand about the Tomboys category but, it is okay if we can still keep the Tomboys page on the Heroism Wiki?

    https://heroism.fandom.com/wiki/Tomboys

      Loading editor
  • Sounds like a cool Wiki! Can you send me a link?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Dose Pessimist can be Pure Good?

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+